Yes, the media tells the people the Judge is Reinbold, who by the way was NOT ELECTED by the people for the people, so why does he speak for Judge DeWeese? – He is the Judge of record who was said to be “DEFIED” this Judge says who appears to have taken over his Courtroom? Where is one entry that depicts Judge DeWeese was to be replaced and WHY that is? By rules of practice there shall be a REASON in writing that a Judge has requested to be recused from a case, please tell us almighty news sources what have you found?
It has been requested that a copy of said Judges Entry on October 5th 2016 be released for public scrutiny on October 6th, WHY has this request went unanswered?
PROOF REQUEST WAS SENT…
All we have is this short story “hidden” once again from the general public viewing via internet, INTERESTING!!!!
Courtney Day , Reporter5:28 p.m. EDT October 6, 2016
“Michael Skidmore’s request to be granted acquittal or a new trial was denied by visiting judge Richard Reinbold.” – SAY WHAT?
“Skidmore was sentenced in July to 16 months in prison for inducing panic, obstructing official business and two misdemeanor counts of assault.” – INDUCING PANIC?, SEE BELOW AS WE SEE WHO INDUCED PANIC. AS FAR AS OBSTRUCTING OFFICIAL BUSINESS, DO THE SAME, IT WAS A PUBLIC MEETING AND ITS THE PUBLICS OFFICIAL BUSINESS, IF ANYONE WAS OBSTRUCTED FROM OFFICIAL BUSINESS IT WAS THE PUBLIC.
“During the confrontation, one of the security officers fired his gun. The bullet lodged in a wall.”
“In his recent motions for acquittal or a new trial, Skidmore argued evidence was withheld that would have been both positive and material, that there was newly discovered evidence in the case, that he was wrongly convicted of inducing panic because of a security officer’s “unwarranted aggression” and that he did not obstruct official business because the county commissioners did not end up entering into an executive session as planned to conduct business.” – YES THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR IN THE CASE OF THIS OFFICER NOT FACING CHARGES BEING PROTECTED BY HIPPA LAW! FOR THE RECORD AND EVIDENCE SHOWS THE COURT USED HIS INJURIES AS DECEPTION BEING NOT ALL INJURIES WERE COVERED BY WORKERS COMPENSATION HALF HIS CLAIM WAS DENIED DUE TO A PRE-EXISTING INJURY – INTERESTING FACTS THAT WILL BE DISCLOSED WHEN MIKE SKIDMORE SURELY APPEALS OR SUES UPON RELEASE. AS I TELL MY NEMESIS GROUP OF LIARS TICK TICK TICK, THIS SHALL BE ALL EXPOSED IN DUE TIME, CAUSE YOU CAN’T DENY THE TRUTH!
GOD BLESS AND PRAYERS TO THE FAMILY UNTIL THE TRUTH RESUMES…