Was the mystery behind the Drew Tyler gang secretly covered up?

New details have unfolded since Drew Tylers last post April 5th 2018

Whats NEW you say? Read Comments on this post, Interesting!

Most Interesting and compelling news can be found here, hmmm? If its removed, here is my specialty copy & paste in case they try to make it all go away?

FALSE ARREST FOR PANDERING OBSCENITY on the behalf of a PROSTITUTE “WELL KNOWN” to Steve Sheldon and his Sheriff’s Office

Excerpts from a recently filed court motion

The advertisement which was the sole basis of the Pandering Obscenity charge does not even come close to meeting the legal definition of obscenity.
The basis or more accurately the pretext for this charge of Pandering Obscenity was an advertisement, attached hereto as Exhibit B on page 15, that “known prostitute” Gillisa Morgan (“Morgan”) created and uploaded onto the internet website www.backpage.com (“backpage.com”) [Backpage, Ohio, Akron/Canton, Adult, Escorts], being placed on the Richland County Sheriff’s Office’s bulletin board located inside the entryway to its office. Quoting Radey V. State, 54 Ohio App. 3d 18, 560 N.E. 2d 247 (Ohio App. 1989) “[t]he Supreme Court of Ohio has found [the Ohio obscenity statute] to be constitutional when read in pari materia with the Miller guidelines. … Therefore, the Miller test for defining obscenity was incorporated into the statute by an authoritative state court construction specifically sanctioned by Miller. … Therefore, when the Ohio statutes are read to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller, the material:
(a) must depict conduct which is expressly set forth by the definition of “sexual conduct” … and
(b) the sexual conduct depicted must be “obscene,” … and
(c) the material must meet the three guidelines of Miller.”
The Miller Test, Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15.
A) whether “the average person, applying contemporary community standards” would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, Roth, supra, at 489,
B) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and
i) R.C. 2907.01 (A) “Sexual conduct” means vaginal intercourse between a male and female; anal intercourse, fellatio, and cunnilingus between persons regardless of sex; and, without privilege to do so, the insertion, however slight, of any part of the body or any instrument, apparatus, or other object into the vaginal or anal opening of another. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete vaginal or anal intercourse.
C) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
This advertisement would have a very hard time of even passing the first prong of the Miller Test, assuming it could even pass at all. The advertisement would unquestionably fail on the second prong as there are no depictions or descriptions of sexual conduct or bodily functions in the advertisement. Despite the fact that the advertisement does not explicitly describe sex acts to be performed for money, the advertisement clearly alludes to and makes indirect references to prostitution services being offered and any reasonable person of average intelligence would consider the advertisement to be prima facie evidence of the crime of prostitution. The act of bringing the advertisement to the attention of a law enforcement officer would in and of itself make the advertisement a document with legal value. The following three facts below when joined together would give the advertisement serious political value.
1) The Richland County Sheriff’s Office is and was at the time of this incident aware of Morgan’s prostitution activities. Morgan admitted she was a prostitute in: multiple written statements to the Sheriff’s Office, in court testimony, and in an oral deposition, all previous to this event. Morgan even voluntarily described some of her crimes in detail for Deputy Pat Smith of the Sheriff’s Office. In addition to prostituting herself Morgan recruits and grooms young women to work for her as prostitutes. Morgan discussed one specific example with me where she had attempted to groom her own daughter’s cousin Micaela Lawrence (“Lawrence”) to be a prostitute, she was unable to convince Lawrence, but Lawrence did have a best friend, Jamie Caton , who Morgan did end up grooming

Free classified ads with photos. Find houses and apts for rent, personals, jobs, cats and dogs for sale.
BACKPAGE.COM
 COMMENTS ON THIS, MAY  GO AWAY AS WELL? – SAFELY KEPT HERE!
Steve Sheldon for Indictment to work as a prostitute for her. Caton who is from Mansfield was19 at the time.
2) In spite of the fact the Sheriff’s Office is aware of and is in possession of a large amount of evidence regarding Morgan’s criminal activities committed in Richland County and elsewhere, Morgan has never even been so much as asked to stop breaking the law let alone been arrested. In fact if Jerry Thompson is to be believed Assistant Law Director Sharon Wesselman (at the request of and/or with the endorsement of the Richland County Sheriff’s Office), one of the victim’s advocates who worked for the Law Director’s Office, Attorney Charles Lynch who represented Gillisa Morgan, and Attorney Jerry Thompson who ostensibly was “representing” me, made an agreement among themselves that Morgan would never be arrested or prosecuted for the crime of prostitution by Richland County authorities and as of this writing she never has been. Morgan still to this day places advertisements very similar to the one in question on backpage.com on a regular basis, see Exhibit A, placed on backpage.com on October 22, 2015.
3) A list of cities Morgan was soliciting was on the advertisement and after this list of cities was a hand written note on the advertisement stating “AND MANSFIELD WHERE SHE HAS DEFACTO LEGALIZATION BY THE RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT!”
To state the obvious, clearly this advertisement was placed on the bulletin board of the Sheriff’s Office because it was intended for Sheriff’s Deputies. Clearly this advertisement describes and is evidence of the crime of prostitution. In addition it is obvious the advertisement was presented to the Sheriff’s Office for the dual purpose of reporting the crime of prostitution and to ridicule the Sherriff’s Office for not enforcing the law. Deputy Eichinger even wrote in his Affidavit, Exhibit C page 9, “On these posting was had written statements stating that members from the Richland County Sheriff’s office is letting her get away with committing the crime of prostitution [sic!]. Thus when the advertisement is looked at in relation to all the facts stated above and in its context to this event viewed as a whole the document unquestionably has both legal and political value.
False Arrest
The advertisement was placed on the bulletin board, located inside the entryway to the Sheriff’s Office, on Friday, October 2, 2009 at 7:11pm according to police reports. It is common knowledge Sheriff’s Deputies go in and out of this entryway on a constant basis twenty-four hours a day seven days a week. The Sheriff’s Office would have been closed to the public for the weekend at 7:11pm on Friday, opposed to the Mansfield Police Department which has a walk in office open twenty-four hours a day. So for arguments sake if someone came to the Sheriff’s Office with the purpose of reporting a crime in person expecting the office to be open like Mansfield’s, that individual would have discovered the office was closed and no deputies or support staff would have been available to receive time sensitive physical evidence. The only other apparent option left remaining to report a nonemergency at 7:11pm on a Friday would have been to call and leave a voice message on the Sheriff’s Office’s regular phone line, which most likely would not have been retrieved until the following Monday. By Monday the advertisement in question here probably would have been deleted from backpage.com by Morgan and would no longer be viewable on the internet. A reasonable alternative to leaving a phone message would seem to be to just leave the advertisement at the Sheriff’s Office for Sheriff’s Deputies. The Sheriff’s Office’s own reports state numerous times there was a hand written note or message to Sheriff’s Deputies on the advertisement. The advertisement was placed on the Sheriff’s Office’s bulletin board as opposed to the town grocery store’s or a child day care’s bulletin board, making it blatantly obvious this advertisement was intended for and left for Sheriff’s Deputies and not someone else.
Morgan had/has been placing advertisements on various internet websites for years prior to and subsequent to this event. Morgan had already freely admitted to her extensive involvement in prostitution to Sheriff’s Deputies in various transcribed statements. The backpage.com advertisement that was left for the Sheriff’s Office on its bulletin board that night was already available on the internet for the entire world to view. Morgan had been publically disseminating her own prostitution advertisements to literally the entire world on a regular basis for years prior to this event.
If the Sheriff’s Office legitimately did consider this advertisement to be obscenity why was Morgan not arrested for creating it and disseminating it? Morgan was a resident of Richland County at the time this advertisement was created and placed on the internet. Richland County is where she would have logically created this advertisement on her computer, uploaded it to the internet using her computer, and paid for this advertisement to be placed on backpage.com with a credit card using her computer. Yet it wasn’t Morgan’s computer and related equipment that Sheriff’s Deputies sought to seize it was MY computer and property that Sheriff’s Deputies DID attempt to seize.
This advertisement was not obscenity and Sheriff’s Deputies knew that when they made this arrest. The following excerpt from Deputy Pat Smith’s own supplemental police report demonstrates how Sheriff’s Deputies, including Sheriff J. Steve Sheldon himself, had ceased investigating a crime and were now on a witch hunt. Exhibit B page 13.
Manage
Reply2y
Steve Sheldon for Indictment 0815-HOURS
SHERIFF SHELDON STATED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED SEVERAL EMAILS FROM AN UNKNOWN PERSONS REGARDING INFORMATION THAT PERTAINS TO ESCORT SERVICES.
SHERIFF SHELDON INDICATED THIS HAS OCCURRED OVER THE PAST 6 MONTHS. HOWEVER, HE DID NOT KEEP THE EMAILS THEY HAVE BEEN DELETED.
THE SHERIFF WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE ONE OF THE EMAILS AND PRESENTED IT TO THIS OFFICER. HE REQUESED TO PLACE THE EMAIL IN THE CASE FILE.
THIS OFFICER REQUESTED TO HAVE RCSO IT-SUPPORT TEAM TO RETRIEVED COPIES OF THE EMAIL SENT OR DELETED BY THE SHERIFF.
EMAILS THAT MAY CONTAINED INFORMATION PERTAINING TO “VOLUPTUOUS BEAUTY” G*F* EXPERIENCE…ANY TYPE OF EMAIL THAT MAY INCLUDE SEXUAL CONTENT [sic!] [Emphasis in original].
Common sense would dictate that the act of sending an Ohio Law Enforcement Officer an email that contains information and evidence about prostitution that is occurring in their jurisdiction is not a crime! Even a layman can and could easily determine that this arrest lacked probably cause thereby making it a False Arrest. The arrest is a good example of what is commonly referred to as a “contempt of cop” arrest. The arrest for Pandering Obscenity also provided a false pretense to obtain a search warrant.
Ulterior motive for obtaining the Search Warrants
The true purpose in obtaining these search warrants is revealed by Deputy Richard Eichinger’s Affidavit of Search Warrant, attached hereto as Exhibit C, on page 9 at the end of item 1, Eichinger asks for authorization to seize “any type of journal or diary relating to Gillisa A. Morgan.” Clearly a “journal or diary” (which not only did not exist, there was never even a reasonable indication to believe that such an item had ever existed) written by me about Morgan would have zero or miniscule value or relevance relating to a charge against me for the crime of Pandering Obscenity. The Search Warrants were nothing less than a de-facto license given to the Sheriff’s Office to go on a fishing expedition to try and find or manufacture and plant evidence that would rescue the Sheriff’s Office’s withering, pending case against me at the time for Menacing by Stalking and Aggravated Menacing. The menacing and stalking charges involved spurious accusations that I attempted to hire a John Rothenberg (“Rothenberg”) a self-proclaimed “hitman” who according to him and Deputy Pat Smith is “highly connected” to the “Russian Mafia” to kill Morgan. The utter stupidity above is quoted from Deputy Pat Smith’s own supplemental police reports. This self-proclaimed “hitman” just happened to be a longtime friend and sex partner of Morgan and during the time he and Morgan were concocting their stories to tell to the police Rothenberg was dating Morgan’s girlfriend, Jennifer Bobo, who is also one of the many women Morgan has groomed to work for her as a prostitute. These outlandish, absurd and unsubstantiated charges involving a story about a self-proclaimed “Russian Mafia” “hitman” being hired to kill his girlfriend’s (Jennifer Bobo) best friend (Morgan) were later dismissed.
Reply2y
Steve Sheldon for Indictment General Offense No. 09-1834 Menacing, Voluntary Statement of Gillisa Morgan taken by Deputy Pat Smith on May 13, 2009 page 7
SMITH: DURING THE TIME YOU MET JAMES WEEKLY DID YOU PERFORM ESCORT SERVICES THEN?
MORGAN: “UH..YES, I DID. I DID. UH..I HAD A UH..FRIEND THAT HAD A SMALL APARTMENT AND UH..SEVERAL OTHER GIRLS THAT I KNEW, WE ALL WORKED FROM THAT APARTMENT. UH..I DID HELP THEM PLACE ADS. I DID HELP THEM WITH UH..SOME PICTURES, BUT THAT WAS THE EXTENT OF THAT.

Morgan again discusses very similar activities to the ones above, this time talking about a second, house of prostitution that she ran during a different time period n General Offense No. 09-1834 Menacing, Voluntary Statement of Gillisa Morgan taken by Deputy Pat Smith on May 13, 2009, page 11
MORGAN: …………….OK, DURING THE TIME THAT UH..I HAD THIS APARTMENT FOR A COUPLE MONTHS, THERE WERE TWO, OH GOSH, TWO, THREE, MAYBE FOUR GIRLS THAT ALSO USED THE APARTMENT ALSO. I DID HELP THEM WITH UM..PICTURES, PHOTOGRAPHY, AND I DID HELP THEM WITH PLACING ADS AT THE DISPATCH, UH..THEY, THEY GAVE ME MONEY FOR USING THE APARTMENT BECAUSE I HAD TO PAY FOR THE APARTMENT, AND THAT WAS THE EXTENT OF THAT.
Testimony of John Rothenberg under cross examination in Morgan v. Yambrisak ,Richland County Common Pleas Court Case No. 2009 CV 671 on August 10, 2009 at 2:13:23pm
Attorney Jerry Thompson: Now I believe you testified that Ms. Morgan has helped set other young ladies up in this line of business [prostitution] or done some, some sorts of services for them? Can you go into detail about that?
Rothenberg: I don’t know a lot uh.. all I know is that, but I think it is somewhat common knowledge at one time, she’s running [escort] agencies but I don’t know how long ago….2:13:45pm
2:14:11pm Thompson: And what did you hear from her [Morgan]?
Rothenberg: just that, aa, uh, just saying stuff, oh when I use to have an [escort]agency and then she’d tell me some funny story about some client or one of the idiot girls or whatever. 2:14:21pm

Morgan even made a partial admission to the fact that she groomed Caton to work for her as a prostitute in General Offense No. 09-1834 Menacing, Voluntary Statement of Gillisa Morgan taken by Deputy Pat Smith on May 13, 2009, page 13
SMITH: GILLISA YOU MENTIONED JOHN ROTHENBERG, WHAT IS HIS RELATIONSHIP TO YOU IF ANY?
MORGAN: UH..JOHN AND I HAVE NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP………………….. , UH..MY CHILDREN HAD A UH..UH..A RELATIVE THAT MOVED DOWN TO CIRCLEVILLE. SHE ALSO MOVED ANOTHER GIRL WITH HER. AND UH..THIS GIRL SAW THAT I WAS ESCORTING AND YOU KNOW HOW I..DID WHAT I DID. I SAID YOU KNOW, YOU GET SOME PICTURES, YOU GO ON LINE, YOU PLACE SOME ADS AND JUST PUT A PHONE NUMBER UP. AND SO..I..I THINK SHE WAS DOING IT. CAUSE I HELPED HER WITH THE PICTURES. THAT SHE HAD MET JOHN ROTHENBERG. SMITH: CAN YOU IDENTIFY HER BY NAME PLEASE?
MORGAN: JAMIE KAYTON [sic]. (Caton)

Reply2y
Steve Sheldon for Indictment Transcribed telephone conversation of a telephone call Deputy Pat Smith made to John Rothenberg on July 1, 2009 at 10:53am, Page 9, 10.
ROTHENBERG: YES, UH..ALSO I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT YOUR GILLISA MORGAN IS COMMITNG PROSTITUTION ACTS IN YOUR COUNTY. AND I CAN TELL YOU WHERE.
SMITH: WHERE?
ROTHENBERG: THERE IS A..UH..ON ON 71, YOU HAVE SOME HOTELS. I WANT TO SAY UH ..EXIT 19, 164, THERE IS A HOTEL IT’S RIGHT BY A..IT’S AN AM PM OR IT’S A BRITISH PETROLEUM GAS STATION THAT THAT YOU HAVE TO DRIVE THROUGH ALSO TO GET BACK THROUGH THIS HOTEL. IT’S THE HOTEL IS A HAMPTON INN, I WANT TO SAY.
SMITH: 97 and 71?
ROTHENBERG: RIGHT ON 71 IT’S IN RICHLAND COUNTY. …… SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE TOOK HER KIDS THAT WAS IN THE MORNING. SHE SAID THAT SHE HAD AN APPOINTMENT THE NIGHT BEFORE…….BUT SHE HAS BEEN WORKING IN RICHLAND COUNTY. WHEN SHE TOLD YOU SHE DOESN’T WORK RICHLAND COUNTY, THEN SHE’S LYING TO YOU DETECTIVES THERE. CAUSE SHE DOES WORK RICHLAND COUNTY.
ROTHENBERG: UH..WELL MY UNDERSTANDING SHE PLACED ADS ON BACKPAGE.
SMITH: EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT IS BACKPAGE
ROTHENBERG: BACKPAGE.COM IS LIKE A CRAIG’S LIST. UH..IT’S BACKPAGE.COM. YOU GO TO CLEVE..THERE’S CLEVELAND, MANSFIELD, COLUMBUS, AND THAT’S WHERE SHE PLACED HER AD. AND SHE HAS REGULAR CLIENTS SHE TOLD ME THAT LIVE IN THE CITY OF MANSFIELD. OR..OR IN THE RICHLAND COUNTY AREA. AND SHE WILL SEE THEM THERE AND ALSO SHE GETS A LOT OF MEDINA, MEDINA COUNTY RESIDENTS.
SMITH: MEDINA.
ROTHENBERG: YEAH THAT WILL COME DOWN TO RICHLAND COUNTY. AND SHE’LL SEE THEM AT THIS HOTELS OFF OF I 71 IN RICHLAND COUNTY.
Manage
Reply2y
Steve Sheldon for Indictment 4 After I was arrested on October 5, 2009 Deputies attempted to question me. During this failed attempt Deputy Lewis stated to me that children had seen the advertisement posted on the bulletin board and I was now a sex offender, telling me this seemed to excite Deputy Lewis. Deputy Pat Smith even added it was a visiting Boy’s Scout troop and the children had taken a great interest in what was posted on the bulletin board and it was all on video.

5 Deputy Lewis was discussing the emails sent to Sheriff Sheldon with Deputy Eichinger within ear shot of me, and was asking in a very excited tone of voice if I could be “charged for sending an email to the Sheriff?”

Reply2yEdited
Brian Chapman This just shows you how rotton to the core this town is and corrupt !

If you tried the Backpage link this is what  you find, hmmm?

NOTICE THE DATE!

This backpage tell all was seized on April 6th, 2018 – (above)

Drew Tyler ironically last posted April 5th, 2018 (below)

What’s your thoughts, my friends? Was Drew Tyler afforded an escape route or did they just die unexpectedly?

TICK TICK TICK, DAMN, WE MAY NEVER KNOW WHO EXACTLY WAS BEHIND THIS ACCOUNT? TO ME, THAT SUCKS!!!!! – WAS DREW TYLER MANY ALIASES THAT HAVE NOW JUST SIMPLY GONE AWAY AS THE FBI MESSAGE SAYS….BACKPAGE AND ALL AFFILIATE WEBSITES ARE DONE?

Facebook Comments
This entry was posted in fair use, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, Local Corruption, Personal Stalkers / Attackers, Richland County Corruption and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.