Remember the story on Sovereign Citizen movement that believes in Common Law?

There seems to be a misCONception to what common law is if you read in this story by the MNJ – http://blog.mansfieldersperspective.com/sovereign-citizen-movement-is-is-dangerous-another-perspective/

How is one to come away with this small paragraph in the article?

“Sovereign Citizens generally believe in common law and hold the belief that they are not subject to any federal, state or municipal statutes.”

One would or could be easily lead to believe R.C.C.L.S.G. Richland County Common Law Study Group is just another one of these lunatic groups being they believe in common law too? The TRUTH of the matter is common law is the LAW! The PROBLEM is our OWN COURTS don’t follow the common law being there has been corruption in the courts which tell the clerk to file everything, even FRAUD!

CLEARLY if there’s a movement, it’s the movement to pervert our justice system as the late Dave Parker was quoted as saying before he was assassinated for fighting back? Lots of speculation and waiting on what or who’s next? Hell, I’m waiting for them to label me and the MP group on facebook as one of these groups to silence the truth?

If you don’t believe common law is the law then take a look at ORC 2303.26 which depicts the following…

2303.26 Duties of clerk.

The clerk of the court of common pleas shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties enjoined upon him by statute and by the common law; and in the performance of his duties he shall be under the direction of his court.

By knowing now that we are the land of common law the above statement is contradictory at best! Lets read it again shall we?

“Sovereign Citizens generally believe in common law and hold the belief that they are not subject to any federal, state or municipal statutes.” – Knowing now that we are a common law society how is this possible?

This sounds more like what Mr Parker was referencing where our local Courts particularly Judge Aults where he has not one but 3 pet projects that are great money generators  for outside funding. They are as follows; Mental Health Court, Domestic Violence Court, and now Veterans Court. Hmmm, don’t you think maybe the Vet was right, OUR OWN ELECTED HEADS behind a movement of their own perverting our “Common Law” justice system?

Now lets look at another LAW – ORC 309.09

309.09 Legal adviser – additional legal counsel.

(A) The prosecuting attorney shall be the legal adviser of the board of county commissioners, board of elections, all other county officers and boards, and all tax-supported public libraries, and any of them may require written opinions or instructions from the prosecuting attorney in matters connected with their official duties. The prosecuting attorney shall prosecute and defend all suits and actions that any such officer, board, or tax-supported public library directs or to which it is a party, and no county officer may employ any other counsel or attorney at the expense of the county, except as provided in section 305.14 of the Revised Code.

Why in every case where Elected Heads like the Sheriff and Commissioners not defended by our Prosecutor as depicted here? Case in point is where in the Brian Garber wrongful death our Prosecutor has been replaced by a hired outside Attorney from Columbus as depicted in this article by the MNJ once again – http://blog.mansfieldersperspective.com/why-is-our-prosecutor-bambi-couch-page-absent-in-the-brian-garber-case/

I know my anonymous nemesis will now approve of this message since I did share what they call a provision to REPLACE OUR PROSECUTOR which by the way does not allow for replacement in the Court of Law – Common Law as SHARED HERE.

305.14 Employment of legal counsel.

(A) The court of common pleas, upon the application of the prosecuting attorney and the board of county commissioners, may authorize the board to employ legal counsel to assist the prosecuting attorney, the board, or any other county officer in any matter of public business coming before such board or officer, and in the prosecution or defense of any action or proceeding in which such board or officer is a party or has an interest, in its official capacity.

(B) The board of county commissioners may also employ legal counsel, as provided in section 309.09 of the Revised Code, to represent it in any matter of public business coming before such board, and in the prosecution or defense of any action or proceeding in which such board is a party or has an interest, in its official capacity.

(C) Notwithstanding division (A) of this section and except as provided in division (D) of this section, a county board of developmental disabilities or a public children services agency may, without the authorization of the court of common pleas, employ legal counsel to advise it or to represent it or any of its members or employees in any matter of public business coming before the board or agency or in the prosecution or defense of any action or proceeding in which the board or agency in its official capacity, or a board or agency member or employee in the member’s or employee’s official capacity, is a party or has an interest.

(D)

(1) In any legal proceeding in which the prosecuting attorney is fully able to perform the prosecuting attorney’s statutory duty to represent the county board of developmental disabilities or public children services agency without conflict of interest, the board or agency shall employ other counsel only with the written consent of the prosecuting attorney. In any legal proceeding in which the prosecuting attorney is unable, for any reason, to represent the board or agency, the prosecuting attorney shall so notify the board or agency, and, except as provided in division (D)(2) of this section, the board or agency may then employ counsel for the proceeding without further permission from any authority.

(2) A public children services agency that receives money from the county general revenue fund must obtain the permission of the board of county commissioners of the county served by the agency before employing counsel under division (C) of this section.

Amended by 128th General Assemblych.29, SB 79, §1, eff. 10/6/2009.

Effective Date: 10-05-2000

NO WHERE DOES IT SAY THE PROSECUTOR SHALL BE REPLACED!!!! – WAKE UP PEOPLE COMMON LAW IS THE LAW – ITS COMMON TO THE PEOPLE AND THE ONES WHO ARE PERVERTING IT ARE THE ONES WE SO TRUST?

WHAT’S YOUR PERSPECTIVE? FOR THOSE WHO ARE LAUGHING OR WORK FOR US WHY DON’T YOU GO ON THE RECORD AND EXPLAIN HERE. NO THAT WON’T HAPPEN BECAUSE BY COMMON LAW THEY DON’T FOLLOW IS EVERYTHING THEY SAY MUST BE IN WRITING AND SAFELY KEPT – NOT HAPPENING!

DON’T LET THEM TAKE AWAY YOUR WANTING TO KNOW THE LAW! – JOIN THE STUDY GROUP HERE

DON’T BE FOOLED…

NO JUSTICE NO PEACE – KNOW JUSTICE KNOW PEACE, It’s NOT just a slogan know you/

Facebook Comments
This entry was posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Remember the story on Sovereign Citizen movement that believes in Common Law?

  1. Oh one more statute from the Ohio revised code. this one is specific about COMMON LAW>> Not sovereign citizens just plain ol common law which attorneys “say” does not exist?? Yup uh huh but here it is from the reocrd in wirteing and I say it is common law.
    311.08 Execution and return of process.

    (A) The sheriff shall, except as provided in division (B) of this section, execute every summons, order, or other process directed to him by a proper and lawful authority of this state or issued by a proper and lawful authority of any other state, make return thereof, and exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties enjoined upon him by statute and by the common law

    Seems prtertty dam clear to me, “enjoined upon him by statute and common law”??

  2. Pretty good blog. One problem is Jerry Ault is a drug dealing judge. Nothing in common law supports his behavior as being legal or not to be punished for crimes he was convicted of by the disciplinary counsel. he is not judge, becasue he does not act like a judge under the rules we have extablished. He has to go or you will never have justice for all.
    Common Law is the accepted law of the common man. Interestingly enough in law even the rules are considered LAW common law. That is what i study and have studied for many years. My conclusion on the Richland County debacle remains constant controill the clerk (people) makes your own laws and rules and ther you go. A littel island of corruption blocked in by the ingnorance of the people. In case you have never heard this, ignorance of the common law is no excuse.

Leave a Reply