Mansfield City & Richland County Officials heading for legal troubles over who’s responsible?

City says county not enforcing laws

 City Law Director John Spon said the city contributes about $350,000 to the county in dog licensing fees, but under Ohio law, the city does not see any of that money specifically used in the city.

Is this a class action lawsuit? I hardly doubt its the City that CONtributes $350,000, its those who live inside the limits getting ripped off, not the City.

Who pays for something and gets nothing in return? Thats right, its the taxpayers & those who are fleeced to pay for something who get nothing in return.

Interesting legalese? The truth is Mansfield has to blame someone for the laws they create yet dont enforce! Is this really what the $350,000 Mansfielders pay for? Thats the PROBLEM in MOST CASES, people are paying for something they dont get in return.

Dont believe the MP, then follow the above link sharing the article in which the Law Director believes the County is responsible for enforcing their ordinances??

 Richland County Warden responds to Mansfield Mayor & Law Director here.

By law, the shelter is supposed to sell these animals, have them conveyed to a veterinarian or research institute, or have them euthanized, Spon said.

If its the LAW, then why cant people just shoot them if they are getting attacked? Thats right, Goddards LAW protects them from us yet its ok if you do? Makes sense????

This battle before the public should be a lesson in laws and responsibility! Tell it like it is agrees with the County on this one, should be interesting! 👍👍

Wait, theres another paid ad that needs a closer look…who pays for this crap?

Now in the Source it says Law Director John Spon proclaiming this matter to be of life & death, read that crap here…

Oh My! – This sounds like something Drew Tyler would say…

Cease & Desist refuting the News lol, IF I didnt share this crap nobody would read it otherwise?

None the less, this battle taking place in the media is quite the egg on City Officials face – Enforce your own laws says the Warden, many AGREE!!!!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Common Law, Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, For those who can't comment on the MNJ site, News Journal Articles, Richland Source | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Finally! – The recusal letter we were looking for, how interesting!

Here we have the answer to the question…Why was our Elected Judge DeWeese removed from the Mike Skidmore case? It was baffling when Judge Reinbold advised Mr Skidmore that he defied Judge DeWeese at sentencing when he refused to sign pre-sentencing agreement without his Attorney present.

This should be interesting now that we know who owns the neglegence in this case for the guard who pulled and fired his weapon in a public meeting causing panic with citizens in attendance.


I requested per Ohio Revised Code 2701.03 – Will check the law on this filing being per 2701.03 this was filed late. The Supreme Court Clerks office says this is not the same. I wanted to share asap, so now we will check the rules.

Found the Rule as described, all legal.

Now we wait for the brief to be filed or is it too late?

Rule 2.11. Disqualification.

(A) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to the following circumstances:

(1) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party’s lawyer, or personal knowledge of facts that are in dispute in the proceeding.

(2) The judge knows that the judge, the judge’s spouse or domestic partner, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse or domestic partner of such a person is:

(a) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, general partner, managing member, or trustee of a party;

(b) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;

(c) a person who has more than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding; or

(d) likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

(3) The judge knows that he or she, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse, domestic partner, parent, or child, or any other member of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s household, has an economic interest in the subject matter in controversy or is a party to the proceeding.

(4) The judge knows or learns that a party, a party’s lawyer, or the law firm of a party’s lawyer has made a direct or indirect contribution(s) to the judge’s campaign in an amount that would raise a reasonable concern about the fairness or impartiality of the judge’s consideration of a case involving the party, the party’s lawyer, or the law firm of the party’s lawyer. In doing so, the judge should consider the public perception regarding such contributions and their effect on the judge’s ability to be fair and impartial. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that recusal or disqualification is not warranted when a contribution or reimbursement for transportation, lodging, hospitality or other expenses is equal to or less than the amount required to be reported as a gift on a judge’s Statement of Financial Interest.

(5) The judge, while a judge or a judicial candidate, has made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial decision, or opinion, that commits the judge to reach a particular result or rule in a particular way in the proceeding or controversy.

(6) The judge:

(a) served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or was associated with a lawyer who participated substantially as a lawyer in the matter during such association;

(b) served in governmental employment, and in such capacity participated personally and substantially as a lawyer or public official concerning the proceeding, or has publicly expressed in such capacity an opinion concerning the merits of the particular matter in controversy; or

(c) was a material witness concerning the matter.

(B) A judge shall keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary economic interests, and make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal economic interests of the judge’s spouse or domestic partner and minor children residing in the judge’s household.

(C) A judge subject to disqualification under this Rule, other than for bias or prejudice under paragraph (A)(1), may disclose on the record the basis of the judge’s disqualification and may ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside the presence of the judge and court personnel, whether to waive disqualification. If, following the disclosure, the parties and lawyers agree, without participation by the judge or court personnel, that the judge should not be disqualified, the judge may participate in the proceeding. The agreement shall be incorporated into the record of the proceeding.


(1) Under this Rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless of whether any of the specific provisions of paragraphs (A)(1) through (6) apply.

(2) A judge’s obligation not to hear or decide matters in which disqualification is required applies regardless of whether a motion to disqualify is filed.

(3) The rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification. For example, a judge might be required to participate in judicial review of a judicial salary statute, or might be the only judge available in a matter requiring immediate judicial action, such as a hearing on probable cause or a temporary restraining order. In matters that require immediate action, the judge must disclose on the record the basis for possible disqualification and make reasonable efforts to transfer the matter to another judge as soon as practicable.

(4) The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which a relative of the judge is affiliated does not itself disqualify the judge. If, however, the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned under paragraph (A), or the relative is known by the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be substantially affected by the proceeding under paragraph (A)(2)(c), the judge’s disqualification is required.

(5) A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a possible motion for disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no basis for disqualification.

(6) Rule 2.11(A)(4) represents a first inroad into complex issues associated with the financing of judicial campaigns in the scheme prescribed by the Pennsylvania Constitution, per which judicial officers are elected by the citizenry. See Pa. Const. art. V, §13. For example, the rule presently does not address a number of circumstances which have arisen in the context of public judicial elections, including the involvement of political action committees (“PACs”). Under the direction of an independent board of directors, such entities may aggregate then distribute individual contributions among judicial campaigns, political campaigns, their own operating expenses, and other expenditures. There is no attempt, under the present rule, to require disqualification on account of individual contributions made to a PAC, so long as the organization does not serve as the alter-ego of a specific donor or donors. Rulemaking, in this regard, would require further study and deliberation in order to appropriately balance all respective interests involved. Thus, the Court has reserved any treatment to a later time.

Rule 2.11 amended June 23, 2014, effective July 1, 2014, the addition of Comment No. 6.

Facebook Comments
Posted in Common Law, Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, fair use, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking News!!! – Mike Skidmore’s Judge was removed without reason?

Now we await to see if this was filed in the right clerks office. After speaking with Supreme Court Clerks office this morning they have no knowledge of this. That’s odd when by Law this document is to be filed in the Supreme Court Clerks office, not here in Richland County. Read the law.



Something Fishy Here…




Its going to be interesting to see how the Sham Legal Process unfolds knowing the Mansfielders Perspective on Facebook is watching closely.

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, fair use | Tagged | 1 Comment

Mouthpiece for local Corruption Drew Tyler” believes an Elected Judge replaced by a higher court, NOW THAT’s ROTFLMAO!

Let’s take a closer look shall we? Here’s a little of what they are saying on the copycat MP site – unsensored?

Anthony Phillip to Mansfielders Perspective – Unsensored

Wanna have some REAL fun?

Ask Richland County how an elected Judge gets replaced by one who’s in retirement?

The people say uh huh????

Remember when we were told by local media that Mike Skidmore defied Judge DeWeese’s orders? Did they not know this Judge refused himself? Not in writing for all we know, there’s no record of our Elected Judge being taken off the case to be replaced by this Judge Reinbold, who by the way came from Ca…

 What Drew Tyler believes…

Drew Tyler
Drew TylerBecause the higher courts have the ability to use retired judges when they need to…and apparently they felt they needed to. If you think there is something you can do about it….lets see you do something. Maybe your ex-boyfriend Shithead can conjure up some kind of “brief” and stop such things from occuring bwhahahahhaha.
Anthony Phillip
Anthony PhillipFYI, an Elected Judge my friend cannot be removed by a higher court doofus! The Judge hearing the case has to recuse themself, and it MUST be in writing to a higher court. Please advise, where is that record?
Just as usual you are FOS, please provide your proof this was done. While your at it find out why Bambi Couch was also replaced? Funny stuff going on here my friend, surely many others would like to know as well. I will wait for your answer! 👍
Drew Tyler
Drew TylerPerhaps you need to read the law again dumbass bwhaah. Better yet, why don’t you have Randy Shithead try to explain it to you. A Judge does not personally have to recuse themselves from a case….that request for the judge to be removed can come from any party involved in the action, including the judge. So, if you want to know why then why don’t you ask them and maybe, if they feel like it, they will tell you. Your the one bent over on conspiracy theories without all the facts, you want facts, then get REAL facts not just your worthless imagination running at large. Bwhahahah and still ROTFLMFAO over and over and over again.
Anthony Phillip
Anthony PhillipWhere does that law exist? Please old great sensei please enlighten us on how a Judge can be taken off a case of not for executive branch over reach? Is this written somewhere in the Constitution where only the fake Drew knows? Please share this LAW where a sitting Judge elected by the people can be taken out. I will wait…

Clocks ticking tick tick tick! 👍

Anthony Phillip
Anthony PhillipIt appears YOU my friend don’t know the RULES! A higher court can’t remove a Judge elected by the people for the people, so why did Judge DeWeese once again take himself out? Funny how this is not noteworthy on the original case docket?
Drew Tyler
Drew TylerAgain, how do you know DeWeese “took himself out?” Perhaps it was at the request of one of the other parties involved. You wanna find out, then ask the right people. You think you are worthy of the answers, they will determine that. If you wanna know why it’s not on the court docket, ask the Clerk of Courts. Damn stupid, do I have to tell you everything. bwhahahhaha. So maybe you should read the rules again before doing as you always do…make yourself look more stupid than I already do everyday when I call you out
Anthony Phillip
Anthony PhillipI ask questions cause we the people are the rightful masters of our Government. You don’t want to follow the rules that’s ok, but that’s the rules! Since when does a citizen have to be worthy to ask and get answers? This is ALL in law and rules how this Country operates, you don’t want to follow then you are in contempt of that law!
No wonder you post under this FAKE alias, you are embarassed to admit who you are or the fact you could get served for such lies. Tick tick tick we are taking this Country back!
Drew Tyler
Drew TylerAnd what rules am I not following? For some reason your little mind still thinks I work on some sort of public position or government. Citizens can always ask their questions but unfortunately when they don’t get the answers they want, they do exactly what you do,,, you whine and cry. Again, prove my name isn’t Drew Tyler. You have been saying that for 8 years and have yet to offer one shred of proof. I know, your going to say, “Come into ABC Whorehouse where I work and produce some ID to prove who you are.” The truth is…I owe you nothing. If you can’t handle the truth then suck it up buttercup, the world don’t spin around you. Now off with you lil boy. You are dismissed….for now.

Read the LAW dummy! – It CLEARLY depicts this must be done in writing and filed in the Supreme Court Clerks Office. Yes, we need the record that depicts Judge DeWeese wanted recused from the Mike Skidmore case, and it MUST BE APPROVED by the Supreme Justice.

Where is this record dummy? It is of public record and cannot be withheld as you say for only those deemed worthy, what are you smoking?  I would also like the reference to the LAW where a sitting Judge, Elected by the people for the people can be replaced by a higher court? IF that’s the case, where is that public record filed? Yes – Just like questions to your friends they believe they don’t have to answer where is this documented? I for one don’t buy it, and want to see it!

Tick tick tick, as I say…the TRUTH is coming, and NO, I don’t mean your version of the truth. I mean the TRUTH that is in writing and filed in the Supreme Court Clerks Office. Once again, I want to see where an elected Judge is taken out without first being requested, and secondly where its approved by the Supreme Court Justice. The FILED document please!!!!!

Do I need to spell out affidavit for you??????

Facebook Comments
Posted in Common Law, Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, fair use | Tagged , | 1 Comment

I wonder what Judge Reinbold thinks of this Vet?

Remember when we were told by local media that Mike Skidmore defied Judge DeWeese’s orders? Did they not know this Judge refused himself? Not in writing for all we know, there’s no record of our Elected Judge being taken off the case to be replaced by this Judge Reinbold, who by the way came from Canton out of retirement just to hear this case, odd don’t ya think? I wonder where in our lawbooks its said we can do this without dotting i’s & crossing t’s? Must be like how a magistrate can scribble on a Judgment Entry and we call it good? Its also funny how appeal case# 2016 0080 there can be a call for destruction of materials by the State prior to appeals outcome? Can’t this be used in another suit, after all EVERYONE in that meeting can still file up to 2 years which is not until July 15th 2017.

Yes, this Judge Reinbold here said Mr Skidmore was a disgrace to the Marines to his family, so what would he say about this patriot?

Tick tick tick – The trial continues….

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, fair use, youtubes | Tagged | Leave a comment

Georgia woman, like Mike Skidmore fights for open Government – Interesting how not many saw this in the local paper?

Sounds very familiar don’t it?

The question we should all have is WHY our local governments don’t like being recorded?

Here, Mike Skidmore was made an example of, yet we await his appeal while others like him and this Georgia woman fear being locked up for transparency. Who do they think they are, citizens have a right to know what’s going on. Sadly the local media can’t be a trusted source anymore when folks know they print what they are told while others are jailed for refuting it? Is this what we want happening to our 1st Amendment Right? I don’t think so!

Drew Tyler is a liar, has ties to local corruption and political lies entered into our local mainstream media and believes NOBODY can challenge it? – We shall see, the TRUTH is coming, or will we have to rely on one perspective as the truth? ALL media should be challenged, even this source! How ever Drew Tylers of the world cry depicting its just my version of the truth while NOBODY COMMENTS???? Well, everyone has a right to refute anything, my guess is if nobody is commenting like Drew Tyler says, which is true for the most part that can only mean one thing, folks agree, or lack good reasons to argue.

Please, where are the Devils Advocates, arguments = progress, don’t you agree?

FAIR USE – No links cause it was not published with the ability to share!

Google Search came up with these results

Mike Skidmore could use this Attorney!!!!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The TRUTH behind the Drew Tylers in the World.

Sorry Drew, but your false witness claims have caught up to you! See how the world is figuring you out, your kind is all over the news…tick tick tick, your day of reckoning nears! Puppet Master, now that’s ROTFLMAO!!!!

Yep, this page is far from the TRUTH – Google Mansfielders Perspective and there you will find the original these Drew Tyler’s hate.


20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You

20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You

20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You By Shahida Arabi Toxic people such as malignant narcissists, psychopaths and those with antisocial traits engage in maladaptive behaviors in relationships that ultimately exploit, demean and hurt their intimate partners, family members and friends. They use a plethora of diversionary tactics that distort the reality of their victims and deflect responsibility. Although those who are not narcissistic can employ these tactics as well, abusive narcissists use these to an excessive extent in an effort to escape accountability for their actions. Here are the 20 diversionary tactics toxic people use

Cease & Desist this! – Its called FAIR USE, and not taking credit where credit is due, Thank you Huffington Post.
Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Local resident Lee Ann Geary tells it like it is, and the MP agrees!

That’s ok Lee Ann, we pay them to attend a certain amount of meetings with the public in which they exceed. Maybe IF their time is so valuable I agree maybe they shouldn’t have taken office or made cuts to the number of public meetings they have, after all half of them I am sure are private being this office is NOTORIOUS for calling illegal executive sessions. You could ask Mike Skidmore who called them out on this, but he was sent to prison for 16 months for frivolous charges and defying unconstitutional rights violations for not complying to orders due to the fact he was refused counsel during a presentencing hearing.

That’s ok, tick tick tick we will hear from Mike again being he is in protective custody while the appeals process is delayed due to NEW counsel.

Fair use content found on Facebook.

Drew Tyler will cry cease and desist when fair use applies when not for profit. This is an ad free not for profit site.

Facebook Comments
Posted in County Public Meeting, fair use, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, For those who can't comment on the MNJ site, Mansfielders Perspectives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Its alleged Darrell Banks believes Mike Skidmore planned the July 15th 2015 attack on himself?

Who knows, maybe Mike Skidmores plan was to assist these 2 in their election bids?

A friend of this group is a neighbor of Darrell Banks, a NEWLY elected Commissioner who was not at the public meeting July 9th 2015. They asked him to watch the video in its entirety since its his belief Mike Skidmore planned for everything that transpired?

That’s interesting Mr Banks! How does one plan being attacked, and secondly NOT being charged with such a conspiracy?

The charges Mr Skidmore was CONvicted of was 2 minor assaults, 1 inducing panic, and 1 of obstruction of official business, NOT conspiracy of planning this melee?

What you should question sir is WHY some witnesses were withheld – primarily the commissioners who were there CONsidering the reasoning they say some of us were not called, yet subpoenaed according to court records? Yes, these Drew Tyler’s say we were unfit citizens as witnesses for one crazy reason or another, but why not the Commissioners?

Yes, not calling the commissioners as witnesses in the public’s mind is reason for concern, maybe cover up, or to not further their being co-conspirators? Yes, I said Co conspirators, and maybe why you have a job being the majority of people did vote them out so you could get in, maybe you were a part of that so you could get into office being your job in Bellville was coming to a close?

Sure, there are lots of questions that need answered, rest assured the MP Group on Facebook will not rest until we get them.

God Bless, and prayers to the Mike Skidmore family as we await an answer on his appeal.

The question we are currently awaiting is what do they want destroyed in this request?

The odd thing is, I was there and don’t know who planned it? At first is was said all of us who attended this particular meeting were all part of a radical group, Mansfielders Perspective? Now that’s hilarious when you think a group of concerned citizens just wanting on the record would conspire to do such a thing, even when the record is turned off? People do realize there is a recorder of public record that’s maintained by commissioners clerk Stacy Crall, right? Maybe give it a listen to see when and where BEFORE Mike was attacked that he was told to leave? Then again the video that recorded the event is all you need, just look at the end where Tim Wert tampers with it (evidence).

Want answers too? Join the Mansfielders Perspective Group on Facebook, don’t be CONfused by the copycat hater Drew Tyler page called unsensored spelled incorrectly. That’s just a hate group derived to spin against the original.

A request to meet with Mr Banks is being made, lets see what kind of politician he is? Camera ON or OFF?

Facebook Comments
Posted in Fair Use Media Scrutiny, Local Corruption, Mansfielders Perspectives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Appeal process calls for Destruction of Materials in Mike Skidmore case?

Maybe Drew Tyler can explain this? They know everything????

How it ALL started, with a simple Drew Tyler lie!


Matt Mayer may have lost his bid for Sheriff over this, but he STILL has his cushy security job to harass citizens requesting public records?

The outcome may take Mike Skidmore 16 months until he is out to tell his side of the story, but rest assured the MP is going no where until its told.



Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting | Tagged , | Leave a comment