Children Services unable to dimiss 2 of 3 civil claims in federal court – Attorney(s) want “Immunity” again?

MANSFIELD — A federal judge has denied two Richland County Children Services motions to dismiss civil claims filed by a doctor who formerly worked with the agency.

Judge Patricia Gaughan did grant the agency’s motion to dismiss a third claim.

Kurt Buckner, who used to work at Family Life Counseling and Psychiatric Services, filed suit against Children Services Executive Director Randy Parker and attorney Edith Gilliland. He lists three claims — defamation, intentional interference with an employment relationship and negligent investigation.

Gaughan dismissed the third claim in a ruling filed Feb. 10.

Last week, the Children Services board voted to place Parker, who has been with the agency since August 2002, on paid administrative leave. Board members have not given a reason for the move.

The Buckner suit arose out of an October 2010 encounter between the plaintiff and Gilliland. Buckner was a supervisor for Family Life Counseling’s multisystemic therapy program and a mental health liaison interventionist for Children Services.

According to Buckner’s defamation claim, he parked his car next to Gilliland’s because he saw her and wanted to talk to her about a case. Buckner maintained Gilliland had presented inaccurate information to juvenile court.

Gilliland reportedly told Buckner, whom she didn’t know, that she thought it was odd he approached her in the parking lot and she felt as if he were stalking her. Buckner said he ended the encounter and drove away.

Buckner claimed Gilliland then falsely told the agency that he had blocked her progress. A short time later, Children Services sent a fax to Family Life Counseling, telling Buckner he was not welcome at the agency and would be removed from cases involving agency clients.

Buckner claimed because of the loss of work and damage to his reputation, he was compelled to resign from Family Life Counseling.

In the agency’s response, attorney Cheri Hass argued Parker and Gilliland were entitled to immunity as political subdivision employees. She cited Ohio law, which says such employees are immune from liability unless:

禄 The employee’s acts or omissions were outside the scope of the employee’s employment or official responsibilities.

禄 The acts or omissions were with malicious purpose, in bad faith or in a wanton or reckless manner.

禄 Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of Ohio law.

“Even assuming this allegation to be true, it nevertheless fails to support a claim of willful, malicious and reckless behavior,” Hass wrote.

As for going to Parker, Hass wrote, “These allegations reflect that Gilliland engaged in a conditionally privileged communication with her employer due to a perceived safety threat.”

The judge dismissed the claim for negligent investigation by Parker because Ohio does not recognize that tort. Buckner said Parker did not review video footage of the parking lot incident.

On the defamation and intentional interference with an employment relationship claims, the judge ruled Buckner presented sufficient facts and ruled against dismissal.

Buckner, who lives in North Carolina, is seeking more than $75,000.

mcaudill@nncogannett.com
419-521-7219
Twitter: @MNJCaudill

Written by
Mark Caudill

News Journal

Link to comments on their site – http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/comments/article/20120523/NEWS01/205230304/Children-Services-unable-dimiss-2-3-civil-claims-federal-court

Facebook Comments
This entry was posted in For those who can't comment on the MNJ site, Liars and Cheaters, Local Corruption, Must Read - Informational... Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Children Services unable to dimiss 2 of 3 civil claims in federal court – Attorney(s) want “Immunity” again?

  1. The first time ever that I’ve searched Google for a question and got a sensible page. Love it!

  2. Great post. I used to be checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely helpful info specifically the closing section 馃檪 I take care of such info a lot. I used to be seeking this particular info for a long time. Thanks and good luck.

  3. Was anyone able to down load any from the sets? Each individual established I found, took you to another webpage, which is fine. Even so, all of the links on that webpage were to advertisements, and the links to them were all misleading. What’s worse is after going throughout the steps for each advertisement url, it doesn’t give you the download. I understand that the way to make money to pay to the icons is to have loads of advertising, however, not giving us the icons is like a type of fraud, and at the really least a waste of time.

  4. Cyndy Ryon says:

    in some cases, buying traffic can help your website. just need to know where to purchase traffic and from whom.

  5. Amy Reid says:

    I got what you mean , thanks for posting .Woh I am thankful to find this website through google. “You must pray that the way be long, full of adventures and experiences.” by Constantine Peter Cavafy.

  6. Abigail says:

    i found this topic very interesting if you have more to teach us about this subject please post.http://www.kitsucesso.com

  7. buckeyesyd says:

    Phil Sydnor 路 Top commenter 路 Public Scrutiny
    As a taxpayer, I am personally TIRED of all the immunity claims and twisting of the laws to protect these tyrants!. You gotta love how these people will avoid you and when confronted use stalking or domestic violence charges against you to get away with having to answer to their lies.

    “In the agency’s response, attorney Cheri Hass argued Parker and Gilliland were entitled to immunity as political subdivision employees. She cited Ohio law, which says such employees are immune from liability unless:

    禄 The employee’s acts or omissions were outside the scope of the employee’s employment or official responsibilities.

    禄 The acts or omissions were with malicious purpose, in bad faith or in a wanton or reckless manner.

    禄 Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of Ohio law.”

    The FUNNY part of the first cl…aus is…NOBODY knows what’s in or out of the scope of these employees responsibilities. They can and will make up whatever they need to to weasel out of charges and lawsuits. Case in point…John Mayer was given “immunity” in a federal case against him and many others who either lied or turned a blind eye in his jealous rage case that got him fired!. I cannot see where he got immunity when he took a personal day off, making his confrontation personal. Not sure how you get fired & immunity, but this man surely was given the same immunity the attorney’s in this case are looking for, I guess they will find the scope in this case as like John Mayers as he’s on the clock 24-7 and it doesn’t matter IF you’re off on a given day when you harass people?. We will see come May 30th when Judge DeWeese gets 15 minutes to plea why he didn’t get the same immunity John got. Will we see a Judge throw him under the bus by telling the TRUTH that the “No Contact” order was signed by someone other than himself since he was out of town?. Tick, Tick, Tick – time is running out in this harassment / racketeering case, will we see John Mayer brought back in by default since the State Supreme Court was just giving immunity to protect the State for their involvement in this?.

  8. buckeyesyd says:

    Paula Durbin 路 Top commenter 路 Works at Retired
    Why is the board mum on Parker’s actions, this is tax payer monies involved here and we have the right to know.
    Who is this Parker and why is he causing so much controversy?

  9. buckeyesyd says:

    Jim Wetzel 路 Top commenter 路 Colorado Technical University
    Another suit involving Parker, when will it end?

    Phil Sydnor 路 Top commenter 路 Public Scrutiny
    Another suit against RICHLAND COUNTY, when will it end? – Is more like it!. These people are idiots…

Leave a Reply