The Clock is now ticking in Mike Skidmore’s appeal, the briefs are in!

Attorney William Norman Brief  pdf.filed 4/24/17 – Plea of Self Defense ignored.

Prosecutors Brief   pdf.filed 5/15/17 – Plea of CONspiracy theory Mr Skidmore planned this event based on his need to be a PINAC correspondent?

Public Records request, brief filed by Prosecution, now let the Appeals Judge rule! – 30 days tick tick tick. – NOW WE AWAIT THE JUDGEMENT ON APPEAL, IF denied I am certain there shall be another.

Its interesting how they are standing with the defense against harassment to Mr Skidmore that his recording somehow justifies attacking him when he made Clerk of Court employees uncomfortable when recording a public records request? Yes, this CONspiracy theory that they believe Mr. Skidmore was not a reporter in their mind is laughable, cause we all know here that’s exactly what he was, a reporter. The fact that they don;t recognize him as one changes nothing in his defense against being harassed on that day or the attack in a public meeting on the record that would have exposed this if he were allowed to speak? The facts ARE clear why Mr. Skidmore is a political prisoner as it was never PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt that HE planned this conspiracy theory? My differing opinion or perspective if you will is THEY planned this event because Mr Mayer and Leitenberger were embarrassed by the youtube that went viral therefor the plan was for this group to silence Mr. Skidmore once and for all being its their belief independent reporters don’t exist being they CONtrol all media? The fact is they do when the MNJ and others repeated the lie that was proven thru due diligence of anyone who watched the video that Mr. Skidmore was never told to leave.

Tick tick tick – now we await to see how the appeals Court reacts to these briefs before this is taken to yet a higher Court.

Read & Question 👍😄👍 funny how the prosecution didn’t mention this group is where Mike was alleged to make the statement I will share snapshot of this from the attached brief you can download from link.

Boy, IF that’s not stretching it a bit there, WOW! Almost as disgusting as the Judge telling the family this Marine is a dishonor to his service, REALLY????

This message typed on facebook is a matter of opinion only and does not in any way prove Mr. Skidmore planned to get attacked for a 3rd time? If this is TRUE, then would that not prove citizens are not welcome in their own public building, they already proved they don’t like being recorded and scrutinized in public. That’s what the following videos depict, something funny going on for sure, especially when the Sheriff hopeful at the time appeared to have something to hide, like did he really speak to the Prosecutor, or a Commissioner for that matter, he sure didn’t want to divulge that information now did he? Don’t take my word for it, watch the alleged videos they said the jury watched and YOU decide if you see anything funny other than focusing on the few seconds Mr. Skidmore defending himself. You will definitely see in the end when the room was closed where they allowed Commissioner Wert re-enter to tamper with recording device, the device they use to record public meetings to later be written into minutes shared to the public. Go to July 9th meeting minutes to see anywhere Mr. Skidmore was told to leave? I was there, NEVER happened, nor did Mr. Norris aka Court Security say one work before grabbing Mr. Skidmore’s camera. That’s when Mr. Skidmore had enough, mind you this was his 3rd time being harassed recording public officials all of which come off as they have something to hide. That’s why the rest of us were there, as witnesses to these guys being lied to and harassed just for asking questions our servants are required to answer. The basic answer would be identifying themselves, badges backwards????

Watch the following video’s, you decide IF you agree with the jury?

Above video Mr. Leitenberger puts hands on Mr. Skidmore, could be considered Disorderly Conduct? The same as his employee who came into a public meeting with a gun, then fired it without just cause. Proof is the letter pulled during investigation of this mess that shows reprimand for using deadly force. Funny how Mr. Norris resigned as a result yet was ALLOWED TO TESTIFY? I believe the Appeals Attorney has more to appeal than just self defense, you watch you decide.

In the below video you will see a different perspective and we could construe this as the reason Mr. Skidmore was assaulted for recording a public meeting, which by the way is perfectly legal, or was?

BELOW IS THE 47 MINUTE UNCUT VIDEO IN WHICH YOU WILL FIND AN ODD DETAIL AT THE END SURELY NOT POINTED OUT WHERE COMMISSIONER WERT TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE. THINGS THAT MAKE YOU SAY HMMMM?

YOU CAN GET MORE DETAILS HERE, THIS IS JUST AS REPEAT OF WHERE THIS IS AT, TICK TICK TICK, WE SHOULD KNOW THE RESULT ANY DAY NOW. JUNE IS THE DEADLINE FOR AN ANSWER FROM THE APPELLATE COURT.

MORE ON THIS CASE HERE!!!!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is FREE SPEECH under attack in Mansfield?

I assure you some believe so, lets take a look shall we? This really happened!

Its under attack in Mansfield, dont you DARE call out corrupt politicians or try to protest without a “permit”.
Mansfield City Safety Director advised we needed a permit to Protest the shooting of an unarmed man, Brian Garber.
Who were they protecting by making claims and attempting to deter free speech? The permit oddly enough was not needed for a protest, the one they referenced depicted the permit was for a parade, not folks legally protesting!
Oddly enough the Mike Skidmore incident was considered a protest when a court employee said peaceful protest my ass shortly after silencing the assertive citizen telling commissioners how a public meeting is held.

Yes I know it sounds hard to believe so here I share the permit Mansfield says is “required” to peacefully protest downtown, keep in mind a legal protest needs to permit if you are not blocking sidewalks or roadways. This was simply an attempt to stop freedom of speech & expression. A clear violation of the United States Constitution. Sadly today what Attorney would fight for you on this without bilking you out of hard earned money?

Theres a differing perspective and CONfusion on what constitutes free speech. Oddly enough the tyrants spokesman Drew Tyler believes what they are doing is free speech when in reality its a hate for it and the same tactics many are facing in this youtube above. Its clear this anonymous Drew Tyler character does not believe in free speech or they wouldnt fear going public with it? Instead they use a fake facebook account to manage a hate page on facebook called Mansfielders Perspective unsensored (spelling) a clear giveaway they are not as bright as they portray!

Next there was this July 15th 2015 meeting with County Commissioners that went bad after a court employee came into our meeting to squash once again a mans ability to speak and record a meeting in which officials attempted to call executive session to keep citizens with questions off the record. Yes, these meetings are recorded and made of public record with minutes of meetings recorded on the County website. Why do they not want citizens holding them accountable on the record is the question that remains. Mike Skidmore seen in the following meeting being met with force is currently serving a 16 month sentence in prison for defending himself, others, and his personal property. The clock is currently ticking on his appeal and right to defend himself in this situation not initiated by him. Marylin John was the first initiator or accomplice of the crime, then there was the court employee Tim Norris as you see here not instructing Mr Skidmore to leave as earlier depicted in their lies shared by local media. Watch the entire video, you decide whether it was lawful for Mr Norris to lay hands on Mr Skidmore without just cause? Yes, Skidmore I believe as a witness and another independent reporter Skidmore had every right to defend himself under these conditions. If not, as a Country we are in SERIOUS trouble! Mr Skismore was a Marine and 30yr retired public employee who certainly knows the difference between right and wrong, the difference here depends on your understanding of law & rights. Lets take another look here shall we?

Pay close attention to the BLAME put on citizens by former Commissioner Gary Utt seen sitting here in the light blue shirt advise after the incident to the old guy Randy Shepherd who didnt move during the whole fiasco claiming its people like this who caused this mess?

Yes, no free speech in Richland County. The good news is the public responded by voting out 2 of the 3 commissioners, their hand picked Prosecutor Bambi Couch Page who’s office declared Skidmore was told to leave was also voted out. Then Matt Mayer another combative court employee seen in one of Mr Skidmores videos that exposes their hate for recording public records requests a month earlier than this incident also lost his bid for Sheriff.

In HONOR of free speech I advise the MP is going no where and will continue to be a watchful eye on local politics, corruption, and media misinformation that these Drew Tylers hate.

Join us on facebook, the closest to the truth you will find. Compare the Original Mansfielders Perspective to the copycat, here you can decide for yourself who’s dying on the vine. Truth vs Hate, thats the bottom line and difference to free speech as protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Yours truly, philly as depicted by Drew Tyler trying to avoid charges of stalking, harassment, and spreading of misinformation to defame the MP.

Comment anonymously or use facebook login, your choice how you comnent. All I ask is keep it real!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, youtubes | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drew Tyler claims to live in Mansfield, but evidence proves otherwise!

Yes, we already have proven many lies behind the fictitious facebook account of Drew Tyler from Mansfield. Now we have uncovered yet another lie leaving the cant prove I am Drew Tyler stalker and hater of Independent reporting, hmmm?

 Check out the article yourself here, it appears Drew Tyler likes to post under dual personalities being it appears they like answering their own posts.

Here we find Drew Tyler claiming to be a taxpayer in GALION, yes Galion, not Mansfield.

Yes Drew Tyler, your lies are slowly catching up to you. Tick tick tick

***

It appears this fake character has a problem with the truth or any perspective that differs from their own.

Interesting Find dont ya think?

Tick tick tick, the truth is telling on Drew!


 Find Drew Tylers dual personality here…https://m.facebook.com/Mansfielders-Perspective-Unsensored-576126515903297/posts_to_page/?ref=ts

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged | 1 Comment

Mansfield man arrested on drug charges? – Interesting!

Mansfield man arrested on drug charges? – Interesting story here…

“Vanness D. Oliver was charged with trafficking in drugs, possession of heroin, possession of cocaine and receiving stolen property. He was taken to the Richland County Jail and is being held pending his appearance in court. Additional charges may be forwarded to the Richland County Prosecutor’s Office.”

Drew Tyler claims I have a sweet spot for criminals, the truth is I have a CONcern with our justice system and what happens after folks serve their time?
This Drew Tyler runs a successful business and I am also curious what that is being they hate this group of folks who question this system, Mansfielders Perspective. Why, cause for the most part in this group we have pointed out the media’s unfair involvement of how certain criminals are portrayed.

Here, once again we have a guy who’s been played by the system now caught doing all they can do to survive, sell drugs. Nobody is hiring Felons, with exception maybe Drew Tyler knowing they don’t have to pay them much, therefor putting these folks on hard times.

Another case of tick tick tick, lets explain shall we? Here I have found what appears to be another case of revolving door criminal history. Oddly enough this one is just as strange. Like we see all the time here in Mansfield Ohio odd filings in public records, may explain why they didn’t like Mike Skidmore and others digging up questionable deals, yes deals. Clearly there was some deal making going on here, extortion more like it, but whats a poor guy to do without money for quality representation?

Lets take a look shall we?

xxx

BAMBI COUCH PAGE MAY HAVE HAD A SWEET SPOT FOR CRIMINALS, COULD BE WHY THEY STARTED ANOTHER CASE AND ADDED A FEW MORE CHARGES? IT APPEARS SOMEONE HAD A HARD ON FOR THIS GUY SEEING HE HAS A LONG LAUNDRY LIST ON THE MANSFIELD MUNI SITE AS WELL, HMMM?

xxx

03/08/2005 ENTRY FILED. ORDERED: — CASE AND COSTS BE DISMISSED FOR REASON DEF WAS RE-INDICTED UNDER CASE NO 05CR68H. SCANNED 3-22-05 WM

I WONDER HOW THERE CAN BE TWO CASES OPEN AT THE SAME TIME, ANYONE KNOW EXACTLY HOW LEGAL THIS IS? THE CASE ABOVE DISMISSED CAUSE HE WAS INDICTED ON THE SAME CASE WITH ADDED CHARGES? THAT SIMPLY DONT MAKE SENSE TO THE LAYMAN?

xxx

xxx

xxx

INTERESTING DEAL THE MAN MADE, NOW LOOK WHATS HAPPENED? HE WAS MADE INTO WHAT DREW TYLER CALLS A PUPPET, HOW EVER REFUSED TO WORK FOR PEANUTS AND NOW FACING MORE TIME “UNLESS” YET ANOTHER SWEET DEAL CAN BE MADE? YEP, THIS IS NOT PHILLY WITH A SWEET SPOT, THIS IS PHILLY WITH A CON-CERN WE ARE MAKING A GUY WHO NEEDS TURNED AROUND INTO A SERIOUS CRIMINAL WHO LIKE OTHERS HAVE IN THE PAST RESORT TO MURDER, THE LAST PHASE OF GRADUATION IN OUR REVOLVING DOOR CRIMINAL SYSTEM!

LEAVE YOUR THOUGHTS IN THE COMMENT SECTION, DREW TYLER SURELY WILL, BUT REFUSES TO ON THE PREMISE THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE THEY ARE BLOCKED. THE TRUTH IS THEY ARE THE ONES WHO WANT YOUR 1ST AMENDMENT TAKEN AWAY! SPEAK NOW, OR FOREVER EXERCISE THE ONLY RIGHT THE DREW TYLERS BELIEVE YOU HAVE, THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT!

YEP, ANOTHER CASE OF PAINTING THE GUY INTO THE CORNER WITHOUT 1ST REPORTING THE CRIMES IN WHICH GOT US HERE? – THERE’S NO CRIME IN HAVING TWO CASES ON THE SAME CHARGES AT THE SAME TIME, WHO QUESTIONS THAT? – I DO!!!!!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, News on Facebook | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Brief filed 4-24-17, Mike Skidmore appeals CONvictions.


READ APPEAL HERETHE BRIEF ON APPEAL

Comment your perspective on this appeal. I believe Attorney William Norman did Mike Skidmore justice on a well written brief that clearly shows derliction of duty and a less than balanced trial, hope to see this one reversed.

Yes, I agree it was planned. By Tim Norris and his friends Matt Mayer seen below in defiance as you see him at the Skidmore trial with badge reversed.

Watch the following videos of the confrontation this brief explains as being the primary reason for Mr Skidmores fear he could be attacked again. I cant believe they were allowed to testify, especially Norris who broke policy for his use of deadly force. Later in which he resigned rather than face discipline (shown below).



Video from Mike Skidmore youtube channel…

Randy Shepherd here on 5/13/15 – still having issues with records request.

Here the head of Court Employees seen here harassing Mr Skidmore and Mr Shepherd not breaking the law as the appeal depicts. Harassment no 2 ways about it.

Here we have another “Court Employee” speaking for public official and once again saying none of your business who I am?

The entire recording of the July 9th 2015 Public Meeting in which Tim Norris recklessly fired weapon beyond policy as seen in above disciplinary. So, WHY was he allowed to resign without charges. He SHOULD BE THE ONE getting obstruction of official business! It’s the publics meeting not his, lets not forget the fact it was Norris who induced panic, not Mr Skidmore who was defending himself against a man with a gun.

Drew Tyler, where are you? – Yes, you can block me on your “JOKESITE”, but you can’t block me here!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, News on Facebook, youtubes | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“Federal Judge ORDERS Trial of Richland County Deputies” – Drew Tyler gang uptight!

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS TRIAL OF RICHLAND COUNTY DEPUTIES

– STORY ON WKYC – 

More on the Story can be found here…

JUSTICE FOR BRIAN GARBER & FAMILY

After years of protest can the citizens of Richland County get closure on their wrong doings without payout and silencing these attacks on locals. Don’t forget there’s yet ANOTHER matter before the Courts in appeal of the wrongful conviction of Mike Skidmore, more can be found here on this as a result of this protest in which public officials tried to deny public on the record to discuss the matter of how County Commissioners can fund such an organization?

 

Some say NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE – I say question their spokesman Drew Tyler who has started the HATE MP page here – Mansfielders Perspective Unsensored hate, all the answers of CORRUPTION lie under the guise of this fictitious character who speaks through a made up stalker account that will one day be EXPOSED? Then again, they say they are in control and this will never happen, speaks volumes on who works for who?

Makes one think the local media plays a HUGE part in this since they unlike WKYC is not updating the local public on the latest from this Federal Court Judge.

TICK TICK TICK – IN TIME THE TRUTH PREVAILS?

RAYMOND FRAZIER THE ONE WHO UNLOADED HIS WEAPON ON GARBER

SURELY JAMES NICHOLSON AND ANDREW KNEE TESTIMONY WILL BE INTERESTING AS THEY SORT OUT THE POSSIBILITY NOW OF DOING TIME?

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE COMMANDING OFFICER THAT DAY DONALD ZEHNER, WHY IS HE NOT MENTIONED? AFTER ALL HE WAS CALLING FOR AN AMBULANCE FROM DOWNSTAIRS WHEN SHOTS FIRED PRIOR TO KNOWING IF ONE WAS NEEDED. THERE’S ALSO THE TIME STAMP ON THE TEXT MESSAGES VS 911 CALL THAT COME INTO QUESTION, IF THEY TALKED TO MR GARBER FOR 90 SECONDS LIKE THEY CLAIMED THEN HOW COME THESE STAMPS ON CALLS AND TEXTS DON’T JIVE? MAYBE TIME TO HAVE A PROFESSIONAL EXPLAIN THIS?

NOW THAT THE FEDERAL COURT HAS SPOKEN, LET THE TRIAL BEGIN!

DREW TYLER DON’T BELIEVE IN TICK TICK TICK – INTERESTING HUH?

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to Ontario misleading?


The Dumbest thing I have ever heard, ever!

What misleading is businesses in Ontario with Mansfield zipcodes!

Who’s paying them for the business they lose when folks see that? Now you know how stupid these opinions are?

Welcome to Ontario’ sign in Mansfield? Nah

Jefferson said the sign could mislead motorists.

“Once I see a sign, that’s when I think I’m in that city,” he said.

Law Director John Spon agreed he had concerns with the sign.

“t’s a little unusual, and I guess there’s nothing in your proposal that generates any revenue for the City of Mansfield,” he said. “One concern is it kind of misrepresents what is part of Ontario and what is part of Mansfield.”

 ***The Law Director had concerns with this sign, yet has no concerns about this one?

 One would think with this downtown Mansfield there would be an advantage to hiring an Attorney here because of having a Law Director Spon and a Judge Spon.

Could be CONsidered here????

109:4-3-03 Bait advertising/unavailability of goods.

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Mansfield City & Richland County Officials heading for legal troubles over who’s responsible?

City says county not enforcing laws

 City Law Director John Spon said the city contributes about $350,000 to the county in dog licensing fees, but under Ohio law, the city does not see any of that money specifically used in the city.

Is this a class action lawsuit? I hardly doubt its the City that CONtributes $350,000, its those who live inside the limits getting ripped off, not the City.

Who pays for something and gets nothing in return? Thats right, its the taxpayers & those who are fleeced to pay for something who get nothing in return.

Interesting legalese? The truth is Mansfield has to blame someone for the laws they create yet dont enforce! Is this really what the $350,000 Mansfielders pay for? Thats the PROBLEM in MOST CASES, people are paying for something they dont get in return.

Dont believe the MP, then follow the above link sharing the article in which the Law Director believes the County is responsible for enforcing their ordinances??

 Richland County Warden responds to Mansfield Mayor & Law Director here.

By law, the shelter is supposed to sell these animals, have them conveyed to a veterinarian or research institute, or have them euthanized, Spon said.

If its the LAW, then why cant people just shoot them if they are getting attacked? Thats right, Goddards LAW protects them from us yet its ok if you do? Makes sense????

This battle before the public should be a lesson in laws and responsibility! Tell it like it is agrees with the County on this one, should be interesting! 👍👍

Wait, theres another paid ad that needs a closer look…who pays for this crap?

Now in the Source it says Law Director John Spon proclaiming this matter to be of life & death, read that crap here…

Oh My! – This sounds like something Drew Tyler would say…

Cease & Desist refuting the News lol, IF I didnt share this crap nobody would read it otherwise?

None the less, this battle taking place in the media is quite the egg on City Officials face – Enforce your own laws says the Warden, many AGREE!!!!

Facebook Comments
Posted in Common Law, Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, Fair Use Media Scrutiny, For those who can't comment on the MNJ site, News Journal Articles, Richland Source | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Finally! – The recusal letter we were looking for, how interesting!

Here we have the answer to the question…Why was our Elected Judge DeWeese removed from the Mike Skidmore case? It was baffling when Judge Reinbold advised Mr Skidmore that he defied Judge DeWeese at sentencing when he refused to sign pre-sentencing agreement without his Attorney present.

This should be interesting now that we know who owns the neglegence in this case for the guard who pulled and fired his weapon in a public meeting causing panic with citizens in attendance.


Xxx

I requested per Ohio Revised Code 2701.03 – Will check the law on this filing being per 2701.03 this was filed late. The Supreme Court Clerks office says this is not the same. I wanted to share asap, so now we will check the rules.

Found the Rule as described, all legal.

Now we wait for the brief to be filed or is it too late?

Rule 2.11. Disqualification.

(A) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to the following circumstances:

(1) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party’s lawyer, or personal knowledge of facts that are in dispute in the proceeding.

(2) The judge knows that the judge, the judge’s spouse or domestic partner, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse or domestic partner of such a person is:

(a) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, general partner, managing member, or trustee of a party;

(b) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;

(c) a person who has more than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding; or

(d) likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

(3) The judge knows that he or she, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse, domestic partner, parent, or child, or any other member of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s household, has an economic interest in the subject matter in controversy or is a party to the proceeding.

(4) The judge knows or learns that a party, a party’s lawyer, or the law firm of a party’s lawyer has made a direct or indirect contribution(s) to the judge’s campaign in an amount that would raise a reasonable concern about the fairness or impartiality of the judge’s consideration of a case involving the party, the party’s lawyer, or the law firm of the party’s lawyer. In doing so, the judge should consider the public perception regarding such contributions and their effect on the judge’s ability to be fair and impartial. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that recusal or disqualification is not warranted when a contribution or reimbursement for transportation, lodging, hospitality or other expenses is equal to or less than the amount required to be reported as a gift on a judge’s Statement of Financial Interest.

(5) The judge, while a judge or a judicial candidate, has made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial decision, or opinion, that commits the judge to reach a particular result or rule in a particular way in the proceeding or controversy.

(6) The judge:

(a) served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or was associated with a lawyer who participated substantially as a lawyer in the matter during such association;

(b) served in governmental employment, and in such capacity participated personally and substantially as a lawyer or public official concerning the proceeding, or has publicly expressed in such capacity an opinion concerning the merits of the particular matter in controversy; or

(c) was a material witness concerning the matter.

(B) A judge shall keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary economic interests, and make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal economic interests of the judge’s spouse or domestic partner and minor children residing in the judge’s household.

(C) A judge subject to disqualification under this Rule, other than for bias or prejudice under paragraph (A)(1), may disclose on the record the basis of the judge’s disqualification and may ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside the presence of the judge and court personnel, whether to waive disqualification. If, following the disclosure, the parties and lawyers agree, without participation by the judge or court personnel, that the judge should not be disqualified, the judge may participate in the proceeding. The agreement shall be incorporated into the record of the proceeding.

Comment:

(1) Under this Rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless of whether any of the specific provisions of paragraphs (A)(1) through (6) apply.

(2) A judge’s obligation not to hear or decide matters in which disqualification is required applies regardless of whether a motion to disqualify is filed.

(3) The rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification. For example, a judge might be required to participate in judicial review of a judicial salary statute, or might be the only judge available in a matter requiring immediate judicial action, such as a hearing on probable cause or a temporary restraining order. In matters that require immediate action, the judge must disclose on the record the basis for possible disqualification and make reasonable efforts to transfer the matter to another judge as soon as practicable.

(4) The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which a relative of the judge is affiliated does not itself disqualify the judge. If, however, the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned under paragraph (A), or the relative is known by the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be substantially affected by the proceeding under paragraph (A)(2)(c), the judge’s disqualification is required.

(5) A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a possible motion for disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no basis for disqualification.

(6) Rule 2.11(A)(4) represents a first inroad into complex issues associated with the financing of judicial campaigns in the scheme prescribed by the Pennsylvania Constitution, per which judicial officers are elected by the citizenry. See Pa. Const. art. V, §13. For example, the rule presently does not address a number of circumstances which have arisen in the context of public judicial elections, including the involvement of political action committees (“PACs”). Under the direction of an independent board of directors, such entities may aggregate then distribute individual contributions among judicial campaigns, political campaigns, their own operating expenses, and other expenditures. There is no attempt, under the present rule, to require disqualification on account of individual contributions made to a PAC, so long as the organization does not serve as the alter-ego of a specific donor or donors. Rulemaking, in this regard, would require further study and deliberation in order to appropriately balance all respective interests involved. Thus, the Court has reserved any treatment to a later time.

Rule 2.11 amended June 23, 2014, effective July 1, 2014, the addition of Comment No. 6.

Facebook Comments
Posted in Common Law, Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, fair use, Fair Use Media Scrutiny | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breaking News!!! – Mike Skidmore’s Judge was removed without reason?


Now we await to see if this was filed in the right clerks office. After speaking with Supreme Court Clerks office this morning they have no knowledge of this. That’s odd when by Law this document is to be filed in the Supreme Court Clerks office, not here in Richland County. Read the law.

JUSTICE FOR MIKE SKIDMORE

OHIO REVISED CODE 2701.03

Something Fishy Here…

 

***

***

Its going to be interesting to see how the Sham Legal Process unfolds knowing the Mansfielders Perspective on Facebook is watching closely.

Facebook Comments
Posted in Corrupt Justice System?, Corrupt Political System, County Public Meeting, fair use | Tagged | 1 Comment